Jurors in the Northern District of Georgia awarded $44 million in compensatory damages and $120 million in punitive damages to a plaintiff identified only as J.R., according to a verdict form filed Sept. 23, 2026.
Survivors and relatives filed suit Sept. 22, 2026, in King County Superior Court, alleging that the companies allowed a booking despite a listing that disclosed no smoke detector.
Judge Joseph A. Bulone found financial gain and cold, calculated premeditation proved beyond a reasonable doubt, but rejected the especially heinous, atrocious or cruel aggravator.
Pinellas Judge Finds Two Aggravators in Kosowski Capital Murder Case 📎 Read More »
The New York firm says Combs has paid nothing in more than six months and has not been available for direct communication in over four months. It also asks the court to pause deadlines for 30 days so he can find new lawyers.
A King County complaint says a pointer listed as a harmless Class 1 device was actually a high-powered Class IIIb laser, and asks the court to hold Amazon liable as a product seller.
Justices reject a Review Board recommendation of three months, finding court records alone proved the clients lost their case.
First District holds a disabled plaintiff’s own condition controls tolling, and prejudgment interest runs on the full verdict before a high-low settlement setoff.
Filed: June 24, 2026 Cause No. 2026-42166 61st Judicial District, Harris County, Texas A Harris County lawsuit claims Tesla’s driver-assistance technology failed to detect the end of a residential street, killing a 76-year-old grandmother and injuring her son-in-law. The case raises broader questions about autonomous vehicle safety, misleading marketing, and corporate accountability. A Texas family
A man who received 95 electroconvulsive therapy treatments and later suffered severe memory loss could not collect damages from the device manufacturer — even after a jury found its warnings were deficient. That is the bottom line of a September 2025 decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Thelen
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled June 25 that federal pesticide law preempts a Missouri jury’s finding that Monsanto should have placed a cancer warning on its Roundup weedkiller, reversing a $1 million-plus verdict in favor of a longtime user who developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. In a 7-2 decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell, the Court
Supreme Court Rules Federal Pesticide Law Bars Roundup Cancer-Warning Lawsuit Read More »